arXiv (All)
open access
Overwhelmed by Choice: Studying LLM Decision Making at Scale
Multiple-choice and candidate-selection evaluations are widely used to assess LLM reasoning and decision-making, yet most benchmarks contain relatively small candidate sets. It remains unclear whether conclusions drawn from these settings remain valid as the candidate space scales. We systematically
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AAPO: Enhancing the Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs with Advantage Margin#141739
- Choices Speak Louder than Questions#1131383
- Artificial Intelligence and Metacognitive Knowledge: LLMs Can Report Decision Weights as Faithfully as Humans in Multi-Attribute Choice#486058
- Mediocrity is the key for LLM as a Judge Anchor Selection#924523
- Mediocrity is the key for LLM as a Judge Anchor Selection#920292
Record · ID 1117140
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive