arXiv (All)
open access
Understanding and Mitigating Under-Confidence in GNNs from the Final Layer
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have demonstrated remarkable effectiveness on graph-based tasks. However, their predictive confidence is often miscalibrated, typically exhibiting under-confidence, which harms the reliability of their decisions. Existing calibration methods for GNNs normally introduce a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Confidence Calibration of Deep Learning Systems#447936
- CAT: Can Trust be Predicted with Context-Awareness in Dynamic Heterogeneous Networks?#1117288
- Joint Factual and Counterfactual Explanations for Top-k GNN-based Recommendations#1079705
- PAC-Bayesian Adversarially Robust Generalization for Message Passing Graph Neural Networks: A Sensitivity Analysis#259493
- Measuring trainable degrees of freedom in materials graph neural networks: a random-subspace intrinsic dimension analysis#1130926
Record · ID 1117228
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive