arXiv (All)
open access
An Imperfect Verifier is Good Enough: Learning with Noisy Rewards
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is widely used for post-training Large Language Models, but practical verifiers can make errors. We study how the rate and structure of reward noise affect RLVR in code generation, with a preliminary scientific-reasoning check. In multi-seed Qwen
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CriticGen: Generation-Aware Evaluation as Actionable Feedback#972504
- CodeScaler: Scaling Code LLM Training and Test-Time Inference via Reward Models#1117327
- Invariant Pretraining for Robust Code Representations#615377
- Invariant Pretraining for Robust Code Representations#614410
- Invariant Pretraining for Robust Code Representations#459743
Record · ID 1117363
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive