arXiv (All)
open access
Demystifying the Unreasonable Effectiveness of Greedy Alignment Methods
Greedy AI alignment methods based on Bradley-Terry reward-model fitting and KL-regularized Alignment are remarkably effective in both offline and online preference-learning pipelines, yet existing O(log T) online and O(1/epsilon) offline KL-regularized regret rate guarantees can seem pessimistic rel
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Towards Bridging the Gap Between Offline and Iterative Alignment via Preference Distillation#974972
- DCRL: Decoupling and Coupling Reinforcement Learning via Policy-Reward Manifold Alignment#1064116
- AdaTutoRank: Learning to Rerank Document Sets via Adaptive Tutoring Optimization for RAG and Deep Research#1116803
- Freeform Preference Learning for Robotic Manipulation#324873
- Towards More Efficient, Robust, Instance-adaptive, and Generalizable Sequential Decision making#1143593
Record · ID 1117372
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive