arXiv (All)
open access
One Analyst Is Not Ground Truth: Grading Agent-Built Financial Models Against Observed Professional Practice
Language model agents can now construct complete financial models, but it remains unclear whether they have learned the financial judgment that gives those models meaning. Existing benchmarks often anchor correctness to an expert-authored solution (e.g., numerical targets or detailed rubrics) which
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Double Measurement Confound in Agent Benchmarks: De-Scaffolding, Ground-Truth Scoring, and Reliability Beyond the Mean#986988
- Beyond Agent Architecture: Execution Assumptions and Reproducibility in LLM-Based Trading Systems#1061727
- Models as interpreters#710750
- Evaluating Investment Logic in Large Language Models: A Real-World Benchmark Towards Personalzied Financial Agents#432588
- Resample or Reroute? Budget-Aware Test-Time Model Selection for Large Language Models#353048
Record · ID 1117527
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive