arXiv (All)
open access
When Pair Count Is Not the Sample Size: What All-Pairs Agent Comparisons Estimate
When an agent benchmark compares every pair of leaderboard entries, the number of comparisons can look much larger than the independent evidence behind them: A versus B and A versus C both reuse A. Whether this reuse affects inference depends on what the analysis is meant to describe. If the board a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- What Can a Leaderboard Certify? Compositional Controllability for Fair Evaluation and Training of Biomedical Literature-Review Agents#1116649
- Clique Number of Tournaments II#984399
- Committees and consensus: How many heads are better than one?#708524
- Mediocrity is the key for LLM as a Judge Anchor Selection#924523
- Mediocrity is the key for LLM as a Judge Anchor Selection#920292
Record · ID 1117724
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive