arXiv (All)
open access
Medical Knowledge Is Not All You Need: When Medical Q&A Becomes Situated Patient Assistance
Reliability in medical Q&A is often pursued by grounding responses in authoritative medical information. We show that when Q&A is embedded within ongoing care, reliability depends on more than what the system knows medically. In a study with 73 skin cancer patients practicing postoperative wound car
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- BanglaMed-QA: A Question Answering System for Healthcare Support in Bangla#618565
- Evaluating Patient Information Prescriptions#806270
- EHR-RobustGym: Benchmarking and Training Agents for Robust Clinical Reasoning#1144338
- Einführung einer standardisierten Erfassung des Interesses von Patienten an und der Nutzung von KAM in der Routineversorgung von Krebserkrankungen: Chancen und Risiken aus der Sicht von Patienten und Ärzten#257076
- How is interprofessional communication researched and defined in healthcare? A scoping review protocol#137409
Record · ID 1117752
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive