arXiv (All)
open access
Where Do Test-Time Scaling and Training Fall Short in Individual Stance Prediction?
Test-time scaling and post-training have improved LLM performance in coding and mathematical reasoning, but their effectiveness for individual stance prediction remains unclear. We study this question by predicting a person's stance in a new discussion from their history. We evaluate widely used tes
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- GPT outperforms BERT and LIWC for stance and anger detection in German news articles and user comments#372269
- Beyond Compression: Diagnosing How Post-Training Changes Mathematical Reasoning#1132267
- From Two Passes to One: Compact and Efficient Target-Stance Extraction#973714
- LPI-RIT at LeWiDi-2025: Improving Distributional Predictions via Metadata and Loss Reweighting with DisCo#821715
- What gets Redditors talking? Predicting discussion initiation and size on Reddit.#189944
Record · ID 1117867
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive