arXiv (All)
open access
Which Self-Improvements Should We Trust? Reliable Self-Improvement When Agents Reuse Their Benchmarks
As recursive self-improvement (RSI) rapidly advances, reliable evaluation becomes critical for guiding adaptive search. RSI typically relies on finite evaluation resources, such as fixed benchmarks, to determine which modifications are retained and what is proposed next. However, when these finite r
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- DreamQAS: Learning a Decision-Useful World Model for VQE-Efficient Quantum Architecture Search#422252
- Skill Blocks: How Should an Agent Load Its Skill? A Caching-Correct Comparison of Pre-load, On-Demand Tool-Loading, Progressive Disclosure, and Hybrid#609356
- KATOsuper: Surrogate-accelerated neural topology optimization with sensitivity-consistent Fourier neural operators#1063427
- When Better Turns Do Not Make Better Agents: Diagnosing the Gap Between Next-Turn Metrics and Workflow Success#1035154
- JETO-Bench: A Reproducible Benchmark for Execution Time Improvement Patches in Java#324955
Record · ID 1117892
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive