arXiv (All)
open access
MIC: Explaining Image-Claim Inconsistencies in AI-Generated Multimodal Misinformation
Claims paired with AI-generated images are a rapidly growing form of misinformation. Existing automated fact-checking (AFC) methods mainly treat this as a provenance problem, detecting low-level synthesis artifacts to decide whether an image is AI-generated. However, such methods do not verify what
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- UNMATCH: Selective Unbalanced Token-Patch Matching for Forensic Image-Claim Verification#1115722
- Common-Witness Certificates and Sharp Feature Bounds for Counterfactual Image Auditing#926830
- Multi-agent systems and credibility-based advanced scoring mechanism in fact-checking.#773
- Identity-Aware Vision-Language Model for Explainable Face Forgery Detection#793423
- Identity-Aware Vision-Language Model for Explainable Face Forgery Detection#789419
Record · ID 1118153
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive