PhilArchive
open access
Resolution Theory vs The World
This paper argues that much of the modern free-will debate has been distorted by a category error: treating deeper explanation as though it erases authorship. Resolution Theory rejects that move. It distinguishes explanation from authorship: explanation asks how an outcome came about, while authorship asks where a live field of uncertainty was closed into action. That closure is resolution — a binary closure of a live evaluative field — and it is here that free will is located, even within a determinate world. On that basis, the paper re-examines the major traditions in the debate — hard determinism, manipulation arguments, consequence arguments, reactive-attitudes approaches, and leading compatibilist accounts of reasons-responsiveness, guidance control, and rational agency. It argues that these views often see something real, but repeatedly misplace the decisive point: some let upstream causes swallow local authorship, while others preserve important conditions of agency without fully isolating agency’s core. What emerges is a unifying diagnosis of where the main theories succeed, where they fail, and what survives from each once the underlying confusion is removed. The paper then develops Resolution Theory as a positive alternative. Free will is not the absence of causes, but the act by which many causes are resolved into one authored decision under exposure. Responsibility attaches to that authored closure; blame then scales with distortion, coercion, and impairment; repair tracks what landed in the world. From this, the paper further argues that normativity is not a later social invention imposed on a mechanical system, but is already latent in the structure of authored action itself. The resulting position is not compatibilism, but what the paper calls Telic Determinism: a view that accepts a determinate causal world while locating freedom in authored resolution within it. The result is a framework intended not merely to intervene in the free-will debate, but to reorganise it.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Distinction Without Escape: Resolution, Exposure, and the Location of Free Will#110808
- Fixed Does Not Mean Bypassed: Evaluative Resolution and Authorship#112112
- An Appraisal of Peter David Klein's Epistemological Infinitism (Scepticism and Infinite Regress)#705484
- Resolution Theory: The Hindsight and Displacement Fallacies#106223
- Causation and the Grounds of Freedom#776982
Record · ID 111829
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive