arXiv (All)
open access
Knowing When to Critique: Task-Adaptive Metacognitive Regulation for Reliable LLM Reasoning
Large language models (LLMs) reason fluently but do not regulate their reasoning: they apply uniform scrutiny to every input, which leaves them vulnerable to adversarial and counterfactual prompts, while indiscriminate critique over-corrects answers that were already sound. We propose MetaCrit, a mu
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- MA-SAPO: Multi-Agent Reasoning for Score-Aware Prompt Optimization#1118430
- Beyond Fluency: A Human-Centered Evaluation Rubric for Grounding, Answerability, and Reliability in LLM Outputs#118367
- WordPolo: Evaluating Language Models Through Iterative Semantic Feedback#1013219
- Do Reasoning Representations Help Humans Evaluate LLM Outputs?#986647
- REALM: Reliable Expertise-Aware Language Model Fine-Tuning from Noisy Annotations#798854
Record · ID 1118403
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive