arXiv (All)
open access
Learning to Predict Future-Aligned Research Proposals with Language Models
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to assist ideation in research, but evaluating the quality of LLM-generated research proposals remains difficult: novelty and soundness are hard to measure automatically, and large-scale human evaluation is costly. We propose a verifiable alternativ
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can Large Language Models Forecast What Researchers Study Next?#820759
- NovGauge: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Diagnosing LLMs' Capability in Paper Novelty Assessment#998778
- Not Worth Another Token: Marginal Value Estimation for Efficient Deep Research Agents#821977
- SciLitBench: Benchmark and Design Principles for LLM-Powered Systematic Literature Reviews#972566
- Do large language models scrutinise what they review? A multimodal audit of scoring calibration, error detection, and author-identity effects#792877
Record · ID 1118504
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive