arXiv (All)
open access
Where Speech Enhancement Hurts Recognition: An Inference Time Polar Projection Diagnosis
Speech enhancement (SE) can substantially improve perceptual quality, yet enhanced speech does not necessarily improve automatic speech recognition (ASR). Common explanations such as enhancement artifacts and over-suppression remain qualitative and do not localize which enhancement component affects
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Improving Predicted MOS Scores, Not Perceived Quality: Multi-Predictor Test-Time Optimization of Enhanced Speech#1143995
- Speaker Disentanglement of Speech Pre-trained Model Based on Interpretability#1048488
- Unified Target-Speaker ASR with Text and Enrollment Speech Cues#1118926
- Associations Between Self-Reported Workload and Measures of Speech Recognition in Adults Across the Lifespan.#670937
- The VoiceMOS Challenge 2026: Evaluating Speech Enhancement, Emotional TTS and Accented TTS Systems#1083292
Record · ID 1118645
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive