arXiv (All)
open access
The Entanglement Wall: Activation-Space Probes as Risk Detectors, Not Context Adjudicators
An activation-based safety gate must distinguish harmful assistance from legitimate work on the same topic. We test whether probes trained on broad harmful-versus-harmless data provide this decision boundary. Five checkpoint-specific readouts and their source-derived thresholds are transferred uncha
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When can we trust untrusted monitoring? A safety case sketch across collusion strategies#1049757
- Dual watermark authentication defense for federated learning: lossless integrity verification against model poisoning#324014
- Trust, but Validate the Instrument: Auditing AI-Generated RTL Verification Plans on Authored Security-Regression Proxies#1014892
- Trust, but Validate the Instrument: Auditing AI-Generated RTL Verification Plans on Authored Security-Regression Proxies#978364
- What the "Spotless" Mind Remembers: How Knowledge Entanglement Shapes What Leaks After Unlearning in LLMs#677442
Record · ID 1118651
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive