arXiv (All)
open access
When Machines Lie Differently: Detecting AI vs Human Fake News
The rapid advancement of large language models has introduced AI-generated fake news alongside traditional human-written misinformation, raising questions about whether detectability depends on the source of deceptive content. This study examines that issue through two controlled binary classificati
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Rethinking Multimodal Fake News Detection in the Generative AI Era#1132051
- Human vs. Machine Deception: Distinguishing AI-Generated and Human-Written Fake News Using Ensemble Learning#1118518
- SlopShape: Identifying AI-Generated Commercial Web Content#1013700
- Can Truth be automated?#731730
- FakeSpotter: A content and strategy agnostic Viral Misinformation Detection Tool#1013753
Record · ID 1118661
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive