arXiv (All)
open access
Why Large Language Models and Humans Converge and Diverge in Evaluating Creativity
Despite the growing use of large language models (LLMs) as creativity evaluators, evidence of their alignment with human evaluations remains mixed, raising the question of when and why their judgments converge with or diverge from those of humans. Across three studies and six widely used LLMs, we ad
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Assessing the Effect of Cross-Domain Mapping on Creativity in Humans and Large Language Models#1011058
- Inverted Ekphrasis and Hallucinating Stochastic Parrots: Deleuzean Insights into AI and Art in Daily Life#115033
- Creativity: Progress and Potential#772466
- MuseCritic: Learning Multi-Aspect Song Rewards through Natural-Language Aesthetic Critiques#1156446
- Messages in Art and Music#772008
Record · ID 1118663
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive