arXiv (All)
open access
Reset Is Not Recovery: Evaluating Recoverability from False Conversational Context via Sycophancy Hysteresis
Grounded language models are usually evaluated by adding relevant context, but multiturn dialogue also contains unsupported user claims that may contaminate later factual answers. We study post-pressure recoverability: whether a model returns to clean-context behavior after a user repeatedly advocat
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- MAIGO: Mitigating Lost-in-Conversation with History-Cleaned On-Policy Self-Distillation#798916
- MAIGO: Mitigating Lost-in-Conversation with History-Cleaned On-Policy Self-Distillation#797502
- Beyond Task-Oriented and Chitchat Dialogues: Proactive and Transition-Aware Conversational Agents#974258
- HEAR Who Said What: Unlocking Speaker-Attributed Reasoning via Counterfactual Voice Grounding#793340
- HEAR Who Said What: Unlocking Speaker-Attributed Reasoning via Counterfactual Voice Grounding#789336
Record · ID 1118745
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive