arXiv (All)
open access
Identical Runs, Different Results: Benchmarking AI Coding Agents on Open-Weight Models
Repeated runs of the same coding agent are known to give different benchmark scores. We ask what that variation means for a team running an agent on its own task, by intensive replication on one machine-learning task: an agent improves the training code of an XGBoost classifier for airline delays, a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Identical Runs, Different Results: Benchmarking AI Coding Agents on Open-Weight Models#1108848
- OmniaBench: Benchmarking General AI Agents Across Diverse Scenarios#373440
- SRE-Marathon: A Continuous, Change-Driven Benchmark for Autonomous Site Reliability Agents#1117735
- Self-Evolving Coding Rules for AI Coding Agents#1155585
- Statistical Gems in AI: Toward Reliable and Efficient Intelligence#263689
Record · ID 1118885
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive