arXiv (All)
open access
Where Activation Sparsity and KV-Cache Sparsity Cross in LLM Decoding
At each step, decoding one sequence with a large language model rereads the projection weights, whose traffic is fixed, and the key-value (KV) cache, whose traffic grows with context. Activation sparsity trims the first term and KV-cache sparsity the second, yet their reported speedups are hard to c
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Greedy Decoding Is Not Precision-Invariant: Cross-Precision Output Divergence in LLM Inference#1062509
- Greedy Decoding Is Not Precision-Invariant: Cross-Precision Output Divergence in LLM Inference#1043092
- Tail-Replay: Escaping the Curse of Linear Attention in Prefix Caching for Hybrid LLMs#799522
- Tail-Replay: Escaping the Curse of Linear Attention in Prefix Caching for Hybrid LLMs#798099
- Instructive Decoding: Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models are Self-Refiner from Noisy Instructions#430488
Record · ID 1118962
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive