arXiv (All)
open access
Training Witnesses: Trusting the Training without Trusting the Trainer
Progress in machine learning cannot outpace our ability to verify it. With an explosion in papers today, every scientific claim rests initially on trust in the trainer, leading to uneven evaluation, baselines, and forestalling of reliable progress. Traditionally, the burden of verification falls on
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Certifying Learned Variables#713973
- From Model Performance to Claim: How a Change of Focus in Machine Learning Replicability Can Help Bridge the Responsibility Gap#78305
- The analysis of competing hypotheses and expert witness testimony: Counteracting adversarial allegiance in witness credibility assessments?#130476
- The analysis of competing hypotheses and expert witness testimony: Counteracting adversarial allegiance in witness credibility assessments?#120214
- Faithful Faithfulness Evaluations: Challenges & Pitfalls Learned from a Breast MRI Case Study#1061883
Record · ID 1118988
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive