arXiv (All)
open access
Counterexamples to Local Reconstruction Gain as a Proxy for Final Fidelity in Residual Completion
Residual completion augments query-aware sparse attention by estimating the contribution of tokens omitted from the exact sparse computation. We ask whether improving a layer's attention-output reconstruction on the same incoming Q/K/V and selected support necessarily improves the fidelity of the fi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Component Type, Not Reconstruction Error, Predicts Attention Quantization Sensitivity#1062074
- You Only Index Once: Cross-Layer Sparse Attention with Shared Routing#259462
- Garbage Attention in Large Language Models: BOS Sink Heads and Sink-aware Pruning#1049738
- Guess-Verify-Refine: Data-Aware Top-K for Sparse-Attention Decoding on Blackwell via Temporal Correlation#134523
- Residual-Guided Randomized Neural Networks#618571
Record · ID 1119136
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive