arXiv (All)
open access
Understanding Clinical Cognitive Dialogues Using Large Language Models
In-person cognitive assessment is both a test and an interaction. Clinicians explain tasks, repair misunderstandings, and adapt to patient responses, while patients may hesitate, seek clarification, or disengage. Yet clinical dialogue resources rarely label the interaction structure needed to study
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AcuityBench: Evaluating Clinical Acuity Identification and Uncertainty Alignment#1105045
- Effects of Cognitive Training on Chemotherapy-Induced Cognitive Impairment in Colon Cancer Patients Undergoing Treatment(Chemobrain) in Oncology Patients With Colon Cancer Undergoing Active Treatment#839350
- Assessing oral communication skills of EFL novice medical students: interactional competence and the Roter Interaction Analysis System#1148685
- MedConceal: A Benchmark for Clinical Hidden-Concern Reasoning Under Partial Observability#792737
- MedConceal: A Benchmark for Clinical Hidden-Concern Reasoning Under Partial Observability#788737
Record · ID 1119198
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive