arXiv (All)
open access
When Does Selection Replace Extraction? A Pre-Registered Test of Agent Memory with a Typed Decision Model
Does conversational memory need LLM-extracted facts, or is selecting the right raw turns enough? Published results disagree. Extraction-based systems report gains from distilled facts. Recent studies find raw history with good ranking does as well, but disagree about whether ranking matters. We ran
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- UTILMEM: Benchmarking Evidence Utilization in Long-Term Conversational Memory#799702
- RuleMem: Active Rule Memory for Long-Term Conversational Agents#926782
- Decision-Aware Memory Cards: Counterfactual-Inspired Context Selection and Compression for Tool-Using LLM Agents#927341
- Beyond Dialogue Time: Temporal Semantic Memory for Personalized LLM Agents#821767
- Just-in-Time Memory: Learning to Curate Task-Adaptive Memory for LLM Agents#1063545
Record · ID 1119300
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive