arXiv (All)
open access
When Models Choose the Question: Pedagogical Constraints in Bottom-Up Multi-Agent Inquiry
What shapes a model-generated inquiry when no discussion question is supplied? We introduce a bottom-up forum framework inspired by Philosophy for Children, in which language-model agents read a philosophical narrative, propose and select questions, and develop a shared conclusion without a privileg
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Fostering Ethical Dialogue through Philosophy with Children: Practice-Based Insights from Association Petit Philosophy Projects#219740
- Multi-Agent Debate Strategies: Survey, Taxonomy, and Challenges#411117
- Learning in Blocks: A Multi Agent Debate Assisted Personalized Adaptive Learning Framework for Language Learning.#489694
- Learning in Blocks: A Multi Agent Debate Assisted Personalized Adaptive Learning Framework for Language Learning.#489688
- The Hermeneutic Priority of Which Kind of Question? A Speech Act Proposal for Interlocutionary Acts#718990
Record · ID 1119316
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive