OSF
open access
When Going Green Means Going Into The Red: Pennsylvania's Struggle Funding Stormwater Regulations Creates Water Woes For MS4S
This Comment argues that Pennsylvania’s strategy for meeting Chesapeake Bay pollution-reduction goals places excessive financial burdens on municipalities while inadequately addressing agricultural runoff, the watershed’s largest pollution source. Examining stormwater regulations, NPDES permitting,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Escape from Neverland: Reducing Nitrogen and Phosphorus Pollution to Achieve Water Quality Goals for the Chesapeake Bay#421894
- Tracking Status and Trends in Seven Key Indicators of River and Stream Condition in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed#621761
- 33 U.S.C. § 1274 — Watershed pilot projects#585637
- University Stormwater Management within Urban Environmental Regulatory Regimes: Barriers to Progressivity or Opportunities to Innovate?#619923
- US Water Pollution Regulation over the Last Half Century: Burning Waters to Crystal Springs?#21464
Record · ID 1121395
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive