Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW
metadata only
Resisting Face Surveillance with Copyright Law
Face surveillance is animated by deep-rooted demographic and deployment biases that endanger marginalized communities and threaten the privacy of all. But current approaches have not prevented its adoption by law enforcement. Some companies have offered voluntary moratoria on selling the technology,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond surveillance: privacy, ethics, and regulations in face recognition technology#400542
- How to Save Face & the Fourth Amendment: Developing an Algorithmic Auditing and Accountability Industry for Facial Recognition Technology in Law Enforcement#88640
- Regulating police use of facial recognition technology in the Netherlands: The complex interplay between criminal procedural law and data protection law#461773
- Saving Face on Facebook: Privacy Concerns, Social Benefits, and Impression Management#300188
- Behind the Face: Unmasking GDPR Efficacy in Regulating Facial Recognition Technology in Law Enforcement#1177244
Record · ID 1121645
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive