William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository
metadata only
Reframing the (False?) Choice Between Purchaser Welfare and Total Welfare
This Article critiques the role that the partial equilibrium trade-off paradigm plays in the debate over the definition of “consumer welfare” that courts should employ when developing and applying antitrust doctrine. The Article contends that common reliance on the paradigm distorts the debate betwe
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Law after the Welfare State: Formalism, Functionalism and the Ironic Turn of Reflexive Law#494414
- 47 U.S.C. § 313 — Application of antitrust laws to manufacture, sale, and trade in radio apparatus#597970
- The New Commerce Clause Doctrine in Game Theoretical Perspective#641656
- The Modernization of EC Antitrust Policy: a Legal and Cultural Revolution#269893
- Market Constitutionalism and Social Rights: A Critical Analysis of Judicial Deference#442430
Record · ID 1122078
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive