William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository
metadata only
New Vision, Old Model: How the FTC Exaggerated Harms When Rejecting Business Justifications for Noncompetes
The Federal Trade Commission has rejected consumer welfare and the Rule of Reason—standards that drove antitrust for 50 years—in favor of a “NeoBrandeisian” vision. This approach seeks to enhance democracy by condemning abuses of corporate power that restrict the autonomy of employees and consumers,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Political Economy of the Decline of Antitrust Enforcement in the United States#21517
- 42 U.S.C. § 5909 — Relationship to antitrust laws#591648
- The Harm Principle and Corporate Welfare (or Market Libertarianism vs. Promotionism)#109019
- 15 U.S.C. § 3503 — “Antitrust law” defined#566067
- 28 U.S.C. § 1337 — Commerce and antitrust regulations; amount in controversy, costs#557021
Record · ID 1122079
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive