arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
surprisal is Not a Theory
Surprisal Theory is often characterized as a computational-level explanation per (Marr, 1982). We argue in this work that, even though a computational level narrative has been used to support "representation-agnostic research" within computational psycholinguistics, the movement toward black box sys
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Are More Tokens Rational? Inference-Time Scaling in Language Models as Adaptive Resource Rationality#1089908
- Trajectory Accessibility and Stability (TAS) A Unified Theoretical Construct for Human–AI Interaction Dynamics#170396
- For A Service Conception of Epistemic Authority: A Collective Approach#712996
- Thought as Internal Speech in Plato and Aristotle#721519
- Narrating the self: Freud, Dennett and complexity theory#719712
Record · ID 1122477
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive