arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Vision-Language Models for Criterion-Level Grading of Handwritten Examinations in Outcome-Based Education
Criterion-level grading connects examination performance to learning outcomes, but manual marking introduces workload and variation between markers. This study evaluates vision-language models (VLMs) for handwritten outcome-based assessment across five dimensions: accuracy, human agreement, repeated
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and Its Applications#726124
- Constructing Composite Scores for Multidimensional Educational Assessment Batteries: Evaluating Alternative Psychometric Models in K–12 Reading Assessment#1001908
- Constructing Composite Scores for Multidimensional Educational Assessment Batteries: Evaluating Alternative Psychometric Models in K–12 Reading Assessment#1001813
- Cognition Was Always the Bottleneck: Why AI in the Classroom Exposes a Curriculum Failure That Predates It#146566
- The Place of Learning Analytics in Educational Evaluation and Planning Points of Convergence and Divergence in European Countries#366984
Record · ID 1122495
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive