arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Testing Our Foundations: Citation Trends, Errors, and Emerging Hallucinations in the Computing Education Literature
Accurate references are foundational to scholarly work, enabling verification, attribution, and systematic review. However, the rapid adoption of large language models has introduced a serious integrity concern: plausible-looking but fabricated citations. Although hallucinated references are widely
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Is Computer Education Off Track? An Interview with Judah Schwartz.#333062
- Judgment-Centred Software Engineering Education: A Post-Hype Review and Framework for AI-Augmented Learning#1077402
- Embedded EthiCS: Integrating Ethics Broadly Across Computer Science Education#468161
- Does a Tool Result Carry More Authority Than Plain Text? Three Prospective Studies of False-Claim Adoption in a Synthetic Assignment Task with Claude Opus 5#612428
- Does a Tool Result Carry More Authority Than Plain Text? Three Prospective Studies of False-Claim Adoption in a Synthetic Assignment Task with Claude Opus 5#610951
Record · ID 1122598
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive