arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Controlling unfolding in type theory
We present a new way to control the unfolding of definitions in dependent type theory. Traditionally, proof assistants require users to fix whether each definition will or will not be unfolded in the remainder of a development; unfolding definitions is often necessary in order to reason about them,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Confluence Techniques for Dependent Type Theory with Typed Conversion#333877
- Goedel-Architect: Streamlining Formal Theorem Proving with Blueprint Generation and Refinement#259505
- Beyond reasons and obligations: A dual-role approach to reasons and supererogation#91830
- Towards an Inferentialist Account of Essentialist Explanation#86829
- Automating Just-In-Time Python Type Annotation Updating#361526
Record · ID 1122869
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive