arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
When majority rules, minority loses: bias amplification of gradient descent
Despite growing empirical evidence of bias amplification in machine learning, its theoretical foundations remain poorly understood. We develop a formal framework for majority-minority learning tasks, showing how standard training can favor majority groups and produce stereotypical predictors that ne
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Challenges in Modern Machine Learning: Generalization and Responsible Use#656564
- Identifying Representational Biases in Datasets Using PCA: A Max-Disparity Partition Framework#1050969
- Identifying Representational Biases in Datasets Using PCA: A Max-Disparity Partition Framework#1028715
- Fair synthetic data is not about fairness#690761
- When Fairness Metrics Disagree: Evaluating the Reliability of Demographic Fairness Assessment in Machine Learning#19024
Record · ID 1122924
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive