arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
When Should Users Check? Modeling Confirmation Frequency in Multi-Step Agentic AI Tasks
Existing AI agents typically execute multi-step tasks autonomously and only allow user confirmation at the end. During execution, users have little control, making the confirm-at-end approach brittle: a single error can cascade and force a complete restart. Confirming every step avoids such failures
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The reach of a verification tool decides its value: A controlled study of verification surface, artifact quality, and cost in AI coding agents#622630
- Testing and Evaluation of Agentic AI Systems In Military Command and Control#659160
- Testing and Evaluation of Agentic AI Systems In Military Command and Control#657024
- Testing and Evaluation of Agentic AI Systems In Military Command and Control#480134
- Co-Evolving Harnesses and Models: On-Policy Correction Helps Weaker Models Catch Up Where Imitation Fails#986733
Record · ID 1122956
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive