arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Conviction, persuasiveness, and cross-cutting exposure: a Bayesian model of voting behaviour in online political debates
Online debate platforms offer a window into whether exposure to diverse crowds changes how people reason: they capture political preferences, the perceived quality of arguments, and the ideological diversity of the audience. Drawing on theories of deliberative democracy and cross-cutting exposure, I
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Online Deliberation Design: Choices, Criteria, and Evidence#717429
- How Identity and Opinion Shape Political Sycophancy in LLMs#794015
- How Identity and Opinion Shape Political Sycophancy in LLMs#789996
- The Myside Bias in Argument Evaluation: A Bayesian Model#86733
- Bridging the Divide: Using LLMs to Reshape Difficult Disagreements#71473
Record · ID 1123112
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive