arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
From Protocols to Evidence: Bounded Claims for AI in Service of the Common Good
Claims that Artificial Intelligence systems improve decisions, broaden access, reduce harm, or empower users can exceed what their evaluation establishes. Predictive performance alone does not establish safety, the presence of oversight does not establish meaningful control, and faster task completi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Applications of Risk Science to AI Fairness Evaluation: Principles, Challenges, and Best Practices#794260
- Applications of Risk Science to AI Fairness Evaluation: Principles, Challenges, and Best Practices#790241
- High-reward, high-risk technologies? An ethical and legal account of AI development in healthcare#679067
- Australia's Approach to AI Governance in Security and Defence#719695
- What Do Technology and Artificial Intelligence Mean Today?#739319
Record · ID 1123230
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive