arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
An Empirical Study of Counterfactual Self-Explanations in LLMs
Large language models can easily generate explanations for their own outputs, but such self-explanations are not necessarily faithful to the model's behavior. We study this issue through counterfactual self-explanations, where a model minimally edits an input so that its own prediction changes. Acro
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Efficient computation of counterfactual explanations of LVQ models#779198
- AVCG: A Generalized Variational Framework for Counterfactual Generation under Hypothesis Distributions#985327
- Diversified and Perceptible Counterfactual Examples Leveraging Expert Knowledge#1109595
- Debiased Machine Learning for Conformal Prediction of Counterfactual Outcomes Under Runtime Confounding#924532
- Debiased Machine Learning for Conformal Prediction of Counterfactual Outcomes Under Runtime Confounding#920301
Record · ID 1123509
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive