arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Abstention vs. Hallucination: Benchmarking LLM Source Attribution for Scientific Citations
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly generate citation-backed responses, yet citation hallucination remains a major challenge for trustworthy scientific information access. We introduce REASONS, a benchmark of 12,723 sentence-level citation instances spanning 12 arXiv subject categories, design
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Citation-Grounded Historical Phrase Profiles for Reviewer Agreement Forecasting#695631
- Attribution Bias in Large Language Models#1104426
- Beyond Human-Likeness: Mapping the Scientific Critique Profiles of LLMs and Human Reviewers#822314
- A large language model pipeline for automated citation quality scoring across engineering journal quartiles with expert validation.#421299
- Initial indications of generative AI influence in linguistics research abstracts: Evidence from a large-scale lexical frequency analysis between 2018 and 2025#323785
Record · ID 1123905
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive