ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparative Study of Rohto Dry-Aid® and Systane® Ultra in Patients With Dry Eye
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Rohto Dry-Aid® in comparison to Systane® Ultra on visual function and tear film stability in patients diagnosed with Dry Eye.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Study to Compare a New Eye Drop Formulation With Systane® Gel Drops and Genteal® Lubricant Gel Drops for Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Relief#995589
- Safety and Effectiveness of Iota-Carrageenan Eye Drops for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease#18835
- Effect of Lifitegrast 5% on Tear Film Markers#801526
- Safety Evaluation of a New Preservative in a Lubricating Eye Drop#907425
- The RENEW Trial: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel-Group, Vehicle-Controlled, Adaptive Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Subjects With Dry Eye Disease#837742
Record · ID 1124465
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive