ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Skin Closure With Tissue Adhesives vs. Subcuticular Suture After Robotic Urogynecologic Procedures
To compare skin closure via subcuticular suture versus tissue adhesive (Dermabond) in urogynecological robotic surgeries. The primary outcome is incision cosmesis at the 12 week follow up visit. Secondary outcome is the operative time between the two methods of closure.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- "Cross" Closure for Reconstructing the Perineal Wound of Abdominoperineal Resection#898053
- CLOSM Trial: Groin Closure Using Layered Option for Suture Material#1172628
- Efficacy Evaluation of ActiGraft in Secondary Closure of Abdominal Surgical Wound Dehiscence#1030472
- The Use of Avaulta for Anterior Repair#916983
- Avaulta Versus Anterior Repair#874162
Record · ID 1125754
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive