ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Lower vs Upper Extremity Injection Agitated Saline to Identify Patent Foramen Ovale With Echocardiography
Study Title LOwer vs upper extremity injection agitated saline for identifiCation of pATent foramen ovalE (LOCATE) Pilot study to determine safety of lower extremity injection of agitated saline for echocardiography of the heart. Primary Investigator Carmelo Panetta, MD University of Minnesota Physicians, St. John's Hospital 1600 St. Johns Blvd, suite 200, Maplewood, MN 55109 Study Design Prospective study of the safety and efficacy upper versus lower extremity injection agitated saline (bubble study) to identify patent foramen ovale (PFO) with echocardiography Study Objective PFO are not identified in up to one quarter of subjects who have upper arm injection compared to femoral vein injection. We propose use of the PICC line nurses to obtain access in the greater saphenous vein in the lower leg and compare to the upper extremity injection in those subjects with concern for paradoxical embolus but previously PFO was not identified with an upper arm injection. Study Endpoint Study the safety and efficacy of lower versus upper extremity injection agitated saline (bubble study) for identifying PFO Subject Population Subjects with history of cryptogenic stroke or arterial embolus of unknown source with negative upper extremity injection agitate saline (bubble study) to identify a PFO. Number of Sites Three sites to enroll subjects: St. John's/Woodwinds Hospital, University of Minnesota Medical Center and Southdale Hospital. One site to perform procedure at St John's hospital Expected Time to Complete Enrollment 8-12 months Schedule of Events Screening and consent of subjects who with negative bubble study for PFO to have upper and lower extremity bubble study, one week follow up and review echocardiography by two cardiologists. Additional Information Data safety monitoring board will oversee the results every quarter Sample size 20 subjects were consented and enrolled is supported by this grant from GORE Medical.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Efficacy and Safety of Balloon Guide Catheter in Mechanical Thrombectomy Patients#892344
- Safety and Effectiveness Study of the Solysafe Septal Occluder in Patients With Atrial Septum Defect and Patent Foramen Ovale#833802
- Evaluation of the BARD® True™ Flow Valvuloplasty Perfusion Catheter for Aortic Valve Dilatation#1139308
- Safety and Efficacy Comparison Of Two TAVI Systems in a Prospective Randomized Evaluation II#865546
- Evaluation of the STARFlex® Septal Closure System in Patients With a Stroke or TIA Due to the Possible Passage of a Clot of Unknown Origin Through a Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO)#834400
Record · ID 1125949
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive