ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Analgesia iv vs Epidural Analgesia vs Port-sites Infiltration After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
A prospective randomized study of patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between 2012 and 2015 will be performed. Patients will be divided into 3 groups: Analgesia iv exclusively (Group 1), epidural analgesia+analgesia iv (Group 2) and port-sites infiltration+analgesia iv (Group 3). Pain will be quantified by means of a Visual Analogic Scale and morphine rescue needs were determined 24 hours after surgery.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (LTAP) for Appendicectomy Versus Standard Port Site Treatment#825588
- Morphine-sparing Effect of Intravenous Paracetamol for Post-operative Pain Management Following Laparoscopic Gastric Banding in Morbidly Obese Patients#810774
- The Effect of Timing of Intravenous Paracetamol Administration on Post-surgical Pain#873858
- Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of US Guided ESP Block With Port Site Infiltration Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy#1127723
- Comparison of Post-operative Pain in Short Versus Long Stitch for Laparotomy Closure#1114322
Record · ID 1126286
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive