ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Infrared Fluorescence Staining Versus Frozen Section for Prostate Cancer Surgery
This study aims to validate the accuracy of the infrared fluorescence rapid detection technique for the diagnosis of prostate biopsy specimens, and to compare it with intraoperative frozen section and conventional paraffin section (the gold standard), so as to evaluate its feasibility and value in clinical application.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Does End-fire Technique Increase Detection Rate of Prostate Cancer at First Re-biopsy Compared to Side-fire Technique?#860894
- A Prospective Randomized Trial of Two Different Prostate Biopsy Schemes#854256
- PRostate Evaluation for Clinically Important Disease: Sampling Using Image-guidance Or Not?#994138
- Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Evaluation of Biological Techniques.#315526
- Active Surveillance Plus (AS+): High-intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer#1164896
Record · ID 1126418
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive