ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Standard Pulsed Radiofrequency Versus Supervoltage Pulsed Radiofrequency Glossopharyngeal Nerve in Oropharyngeal Cancer Pain
The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of supervoltage pulsed radiofrequency glossopharyngeal nerve therapy versus standard pulsed radiofrequency in reduction of oropharyngeal cancer pain, through Visual analog scale score reduction.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Infiltration of 2% Lidocaine With and Without Needle as Analgesia in Epidural Needle Insertion#1163889
- Childhood Migraine Treatment Noninvasive Pulsed Radiofrequency vs Flunarizine#852267
- Sensory Characteristics and Psychosocial Factors Related With Non-specific Neck Musculoskeletal Pain Chronification#836756
- Efficacy of Greater Occipital Nerve Radiofrequency for Refractory Migraine Treatment#853790
- Pulse Radiofrequency and Occipital Nerve Block for Chronic Migraine Patients#875875
Record · ID 1126750
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive