ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Oral Hyoscine vs Lidocaine-Prilocaine Spray vs Placebo for HSG Pain Relief
This single-centre, three-arm, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral hyoscine butylbromide, topical lidocaine-prilocaine spray and placebo for reducing pain during hysterosalpingography in women with primary infertility. Pain was self-rated using an 11-point numerical rating scale at predefined procedural time points, including cervical instrumentation and uterine filling.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Lidocaine-Prilocaine (EMLA) Cream as Analgesia in Hysterosalpingography Practice#1088474
- Targeted Lidocaine Infusion for Pain Reduction in Office Hysteroscopy#881151
- Intrauterine Anesthesia in Operative, Awake, Office Hysteroscopy. A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial#1125507
- Lidocaine Prilocaine Spray in Reducing Pain During Hysterosalpingography in Women With Primary Infertility#903657
- Efficacy of Uterine Lidocaine Flushing in HyFoSy#862328
Record · ID 1127123
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive