ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A 3-way Crossover Clinical Investigation to Assess the Performance of Two Different Sized Polyurethane Condoms Versus a Latex Condom in Healthy Monogamous Couples.
This investigation is designed to evaluate the performance rate of two polyurethane male condoms with different sizes and thicknesses versus a standard natural rubber latex (NRL) male condom. The purpose of this study is to see how well the experimental condoms perform compared to the latex rubber condom (for example, how often the different condom types break or slip off the penis). Sponsor also wants to find out how well couples like using the three condom types and whether they experience any problems when using the condoms (for example, irritation or discomfort).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparing Urinary Tract Infections in Children With Spina Bifida Using Two Types of Catheters for Catheterization#860065
- Toward safer digital sexual health communication: evaluating the public health reliability of large language model responses on sexually transmitted infections.#678395
- A Single-Arm, Dose Escalation of an Intraurethral Alprostadil Paste for Erectile Dysfunction#992249
- A Post-Approval, Single-Arm Study of the SYNERGY Stent System in China#811283
- A Study Comparing the Dulaglutide Pen and the Semaglutide Pen#884775
Record · ID 1127200
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive