ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
McGrath vs. C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy Comparison in Endotracheal Tube Insertion
Tracheal intubation is commonly performed using a standard Macintosh blade, but recently there has been advanced technology using video laryngoscopy (VL).In this modern era, there are various types of available VL to make it easier for anesthesiologists to perform intubation, especially in patients with difficult airway anatomy. Various studies showed different results regarding the effectiveness of both C-MAC® and McGrath®, by assessing the comparison of the effectiveness, valuable information will be obtained for further consideration by experts in choosing the best tools in the future.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Comparison of C-MAC Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation#866549
- Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope Video-Laryngoscope#811277
- McGrath Video Laryngoscope for All Intubations in the Operating Room#1113273
- Comparison of SensaScope Intuboscope and McGrath Series 5 for Endotracheal Intubation#864454
- Airway Evaluation by McGrath Videolaryngoscope#844766
Record · ID 1127383
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive