ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Study to Evaluate Direct Wire Pacing (DWP) for Measuring Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)
This is a randomized, non-inferiority, crossover investigation comparing the Direct Wire Pacing (DWP) versus standard method to measure Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in subjects with FFR indications. All subjects requiring on a clinical basis a pressure wire assessment of coronary artery stenosis(es) will be eligible to take part in the study.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Simultaneous Assessment of FFR and SPECT#907328
- Impact of Interventional Revascularization on the Physiological Assessment of Bystander Coronary Lesions by FFR#906766
- Novel Adenosine-independent Index of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity Resting Flow Reserve#830105
- Dual Energy CT for Ischemia Determination Compared to "Gold Standard" Non-Invasive and Invasive Techniques#806910
- In the Management of Coronary Artery Disease, Does Routine Pressure Wire Assessment at the Time of Coronary Angiography Affect Management Strategy, Hospital Costs and Outcomes?#1046386
Record · ID 1127979
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive