arXiv (All)
open access
How to verify the precision of density-functional-theory implementations via reproducible and universal workflows
In the past decades many density-functional theory methods and codes adopting periodic boundary conditions have been developed and are now extensively used in condensed matter physics and materials science research. Only in 2016, however, their precision (i.e., to which extent properties computed wi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A viable and accurate route to GW simulations of metals and doped semiconductors#999669
- Study of Sterically Crowded Alkanes: Assessment of Non‐Empirical Density Functionals Including Double‐Hybrid (Cost‐Effective) Methods#178073
- The Cosmological Simulation Code OpenGadget3 - Implementation of Self-Interacting Dark Matter#1035421
- Full simulation for the Qweak experiment at 1.16 and 0.877 GeV and their impact on extracting the PV asymmetry in the N→Δ a transition#957599
- A Large-Scale Dynamic Characterization of Flaky Tests in Quantum Software: The Qiskit Terra Case Study#986183
Record · ID 1128483
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive